When even the liberal Washington Post lambasts a Democratic Party leader, one can be pretty certain that the Democrat has committed a serious gaffe. In the case of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's Middle East diplomacy tour, it was a doozy. On Thursday, in a lead editorial entitled "Pratfall in Damascus--Nancy Pelosi's Foolish Shuttle Diplomacy," the Post ripped into the pretentious Speaker:
HOUSE SPEAKER Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) offered an excellent demonstration yesterday of why members of Congress should not attempt to supplant the secretary of state when traveling abroad. After a meeting with Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad in Damascus, Ms. Pelosi announced that she had delivered a message from Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that "Israel was ready to engage in peace talks" with Syria. What's more, she added, Mr. Assad was ready to "resume the peace process" as well. Having announced this seeming diplomatic breakthrough, Ms. Pelosi suggested that her Kissingerian shuttle diplomacy was just getting started. "We expressed our interest in using our good offices in promoting peace between Israel and Syria," she said.
Only one problem: The Israeli prime minister entrusted Ms. Pelosi with no such message. "What was communicated to the U.S. House Speaker does not contain any change in the policies of Israel," said a statement quickly issued by the prime minister's office. In fact, Mr. Olmert told Ms. Pelosi that "a number of Senate and House members who recently visited Damascus received the impression that despite the declarations of Bashar Assad, there is no change in the position of his country regarding a possible peace process with Israel." In other words, Ms. Pelosi not only misrepresented Israel's position but was virtually alone in failing to discern that Mr. Assad's words were mere propaganda.
Ms. Pelosi, the Post relates, went on to grandiloquently proclaim, ""We came in friendship, hope, and determined that the road to Damascus is a road to peace." Not impressed with Speaker Pelosi's attempt to don the mantle of Paul of Tarsus, the Post concluded:
Never mind that that statement is ludicrous: As any diplomat with knowledge of the region could have told Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Assad is a corrupt thug whose overriding priority at the moment is not peace with Israel but heading off U.N. charges that he orchestrated the murder of former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq al-Hariri. The really striking development here is the attempt by a Democratic congressional leader to substitute her own foreign policy for that of a sitting Republican president. Two weeks ago Ms. Pelosi rammed legislation through the House of Representatives that would strip Mr. Bush of his authority as commander in chief to manage troop movements in Iraq. Now she is attempting to introduce a new Middle East policy that directly conflicts with that of the president. We have found much to criticize in Mr. Bush's military strategy and regional diplomacy. But Ms. Pelosi's attempt to establish a shadow presidency is not only counterproductive, it is foolish.
For another devestating critique of Speaker Pelosi's attempt at usurping the Constitutional power and duties of the President in conducting U.S. foreign policy, from a more expected source, the Wall Street Journal, read today's lead editorial in the WSJ.com OpinionJournal, "Democrats at War." All in all, a very bad week for Speaker Nancy "Give Peace a Chance" Pelosi. It would be amusing, were it not for the abuse to the Constitutional separation of powers and the Logan Act.